advertisement

Top News Stories

President Obama Reacts To Tornado Disaster

 

 

 

 
President Barack Obama spoke Tuesday on the damage from a massive tornado that ripped through the town of Moore, Oklahoma, on Monday.
 
"In an instant, neighborhoods were destroyed, dozens of people lost their live," Obama said.
 
"In some cases there will be enormous grief that has to be absorbed, but you will not travel that path alone. Your country will travel with you," Obama continued.
 
"We are a nation that stands with our fellow citizens as long as it takes," Obama said.
 
Obama noted that Oklahomans would "get everything that it needs right away" to help with tornado recovery. He recognized individuals who worked to protect others during the massive storm, which killed at least 24 people and destroyed a hospital and an elementary school.
"Our gratitude is with the teachers who gave their all to shield their children," Obama said.
 
Below, Obama's full remarks on the Oklahoma tornado:
 
Good morning, everybody. As we all know by now, a series of storms swept across the Plains yesterday, and one of the most destructive tornadoes in history sliced through the towns of Newcastle and Moore, Oklahoma. In an instant, neighborhoods were destroyed. Dozens of people lost their lives. Many more were injured. And among the victims were young children, trying to take shelter in the safest place they knew -- their school.
 
So our prayers are with the people of Oklahoma today.
 
Our gratitude is with the teachers who gave their all to shield their children; with the neighbors, first responders, and emergency personnel who raced to help as soon as the tornado passed; and with all of those who, as darkness fell, searched for survivors through the night.
 
As a nation, our full focus right now is on the urgent work of rescue, and the hard work of recovery and rebuilding that lies ahead.
 
Yesterday, I spoke with Governor Fallin to make it clear to Oklahomans that they would have all the resources that they need at their disposal. Last night, I issued a disaster declaration to expedite those resources, to support the Governor’s team in the immediate response, and to offer direct assistance to folks who have suffered loss. I also just spoke with Mayor Lewis of Moore, Oklahoma, to ensure that he’s getting everything that he needs.
 
I've met with Secretary Napolitano this morning and my Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Advisor, Lisa Monaco, to underscore that point that Oklahoma needs to get everything that it needs right away. The FEMA Administrator, Craig Fugate, is on his way to Oklahoma as we speak. FEMA staff was first deployed to Oklahoma’s Emergency Operations Center on Sunday, as the state already was facing down the first wave of deadly tornadoes. Yesterday, FEMA activated Urban Search and Rescue Teams from Texas, Nebraska, and Tennessee to assist in the ongoing search and rescue efforts, and a mobile response unit to boost communications and logistical support.
 
So the people of Moore should know that their country will remain on the ground, there for them, beside them as long as it takes. For there are homes and schools to rebuild, businesses and hospitals to reopen, there are parents to console, first responders to comfort, and, of course, frightened children who will need our continued love and attention.
 
There are empty spaces where there used to be living rooms, and bedrooms, and classrooms, and, in time, we’re going to need to refill those spaces with love and laughter and community.
\
We don’t yet know the full extent of the damage from this week’s storm. We don't know both the human and economic losses that may have occurred. We know that severe rumbling of weather, bad weather, through much of the country still continues, and we're also preparing for a hurricane season that begins next week.
 
But if there is hope to hold on to, not just in Oklahoma but around the country, it's the knowledge that the good people there and in Oklahoma are better prepared for this type of storm than most. And what they can be certain of is that Americans from every corner of this country will be right there with them, opening our homes, our hearts to those in need. Because we're a nation that stands with our fellow citizens as long as it takes. We've seen that spirit in Joplin, in Tuscaloosa; we saw that spirit in Boston and Breezy Point. And that’s what the people of Oklahoma are going to need from us right now.
 
For those of you who want to help, you can go online right now to the American Red Cross, which is already on the ground in Moore. Already we've seen the University of Oklahoma announce that it will provide housing for displaced families. We've seen local churches and companies open their doors and their wallets. And last night, the people of Joplin dispatched a team to help the people of Moore.
 
So for all those who’ve been affected, we recognize that you face a long road ahead. In some cases, there will be enormous grief that has to be absorbed, but you will not travel that path alone. Your country will travel it with you, fueled by our faith in the Almighty and our faith in one another.
 
So our prayers are with the people of Oklahoma today. And we will back up those prayers with deeds for as long as it takes.
Thank you very much.
 
 
POST YOUR OPINION: www.TheOpinionPoll.com
 
HUFFINGTONPOST.COM
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/21/obama-oklahoma-tornado-2013_n_3312267.html

Oklahoma Senators Repeatedly Opposed Disaster Relief Funds

 

 

Jim Inhofe Tom Coburn

 

 As frantic rescue missions continued Monday in Oklahoma following the catastrophic tornadoes that ripped through the state, it appeared increasingly likely that residents who lost homes and businesses would turn to the federal government for emergency disaster aid. That could put the state's two Republican senators in an awkward position. 

 
Sens. Jim Inhofe and Tom Coburn, both Republicans, are fiscal hawks who have repeatedly voted against funding disaster aid for other parts of the country. They also have opposed increased funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which administers federal disaster relief. 
 
Late last year, Inhofe and Coburn both backed a plan to slash disaster relief to victims of Hurricane Sandy. In a December press release, Coburn complained that the Sandy Relief bill contained "wasteful spending," and identified a series of items he objected to, including "$12.9 billion for future disaster mitigation activities and studies." 
 
Coburn spokesman John Hart on Monday evening confirmed that the senator will seek to ensure that any additional funding for tornado disaster relief in Oklahoma be offset by cuts to federal spending elsewhere in the budget. "That's always been his position [to offset disaster aid]," Hart said. "He supported offsets to the bill funding the OKC bombing recovery effort." Those offsets were achieved in 1995 by tapping federal funds that had not yet been appropriated. 
 
In 2011, both senators opposed legislation that would have granted necessary funding for FEMA when the agency was set to run out of money. Sending the funds to FEMA would have been "unconscionable," Coburn said at the time.
 
Hart said Coburn had "never made parochial calculations" about Oklahoma's disproportionate share of disaster funds, "as his voting record and campaign against earmarks demonstrates." Hart added that Coburn, "makes no apologies for voting against disaster aid bills that are often poorly conceived and used to finance priorities that have little to do with disasters." 
 
A representative for Inhofe could not immediately be reached for comment. Inhofe earlier tweeted: "The devastation in Oklahoma is heartbreaking. Please join me and #PrayforOklahoma. Spread the word." 
 
Coburn also put out a message on Twitter, writing, "My thoughts and prayers are with those in Oklahoma affected by the tragic tornado outbreak."
 
Oklahoma currently ranks third in the nation after Texas and California in terms of total federal disaster and fire declarations, which kickstart the federal emergency relief funding process. Just last month, President Barack Obama signed a disaster declaration for the state following severe snowstorms. 
 
And despite their voting record on disaster aid for other states, both Coburn and Inhofe appear to sing a different tune when it comes to such funding for Oklahoma.
 
In January of 2007, Coburn urged federal officials to speed disaster relief aid after the state faced a major ice storm. 
 
A year later, in 2008, Inhofe lauded the fact that emergency relief from the Department of Housing and Urban Development would be given to 24 Oklahoma counties. "The impact of severe weather has been truly devastating to many Oklahoma communities across the state. I am pleased that the people whose lives have been affected by disastrous weather are getting much-needed federal assistance," he said at the time. 
 
The cost of the recovery effort for this week's tornadoes is likely to be high. After a spate of tornadoes in the state in 1999, Oklahomans requested and received $67.8 million in federal relief funds.
 
 
POST YOUR OPINION: www.TheOpinionPoll.com
 
HUFFINGTONPOST.COM
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/oklahoma-senators-disaster-relief_n_3309234.html
  

Harvard Students Demand Investigation Into Thesis About Latino Immigrants' IQ

http://c.o0bc.com/rf/image_539o215/Boston/2011-2020/2013/02/01/Boston.com/Metro/Advance/Images/02harvardpics%2018.jpg

Outraged Harvard students have delivered a petition with over 1,200 signatures to the university's president demanding an investigation into how a doctoral thesis, arguing that Latino immigrants had lower IQ's than non-Latino whites, came to be approved in the first place.

The petition also calls on banning future racial superiority research at Harvard University.

The thesis, "IQ and Immigration Policy" was written in 2009 by former Heritage Foundation policy analyst Jason Richwine, who last week resigned to his post amid disclosures of the controversial dissertation.

In the paper he also recommends the U.S. adopt an immigration policy based on IQ, a score derived from a standardized test designed to assess intelligence.

Richwine went on to say only immigrants with the highest IQs should be let in and that Hispanics, their children and grandchildren were destined to lesser intellect.  

Richwine's dissertation said, “Today’s immigrants are not as intelligent on average as white natives. The IQ difference between the two groups is large enough to have substantial negative effects on the economy and on American society." 

"The upside is that calling attention to this problem may help focus policy on attracting a different kind of immigrant - the poor with great potential," he wrote.

Richwine is unapologetic for his comments, and that has only served to fuel the Harvard student body, which delivered a petition last week to president Drew Faust and David Ellwood, the dean of the John F. Kennedy School of Government.

“One of the many mischaracterizations of my dissertation is that I support an ethnicity-based immigration policy,” he said to the Boston Globe on FridayDescription: http://global.fncstatic.com/static/v/all/img/external-link.png. “I do not. I endorse treating everyone as individuals. That’s clear throughout the text.”

The new petition was coupled with a letter condemning Richwine's research as "racist claims" Description: http://global.fncstatic.com/static/v/all/img/external-link.pngthat are "unfit for Harvard Kennedy School and Harvard University as a whole." 

The letter was signed by over 23 student groups including the HKS Latino Caucas, Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, HKS Latin American Caucus, the Black Student Union at the Harvard Kennedy School and the Women's Policy journal.

"We believe in academic freedom as it is crucial to the functioning of a university," the letter said. "However, we also believe that putting forth claims of racial superiority based on inherent genetic advantage to be on par with those who have used pseudo-science throughout history to justify state-based hate."

Richwine said the move by the Harvard student body could set a dangerous precedent. 

“This is a really worrisome idea here, that the students want to dictate what scholarship will be allowed at Harvard University,” an unemployed Richwine told The Boston Globe on Friday.

Ellwood, the Kennedy School dean, urged scholars and critics to review Richwine's work carefully before engaging in a reasoned discussion about it.

"All PhD dissertations are reviewed by a committee of scholars," Ellwood said in a statement. “In this case, the committee consisted of three highly respected and discerning faculty members who come from diverse intellectual traditions.”

Richwine's work was backed by George Borjas, the chairman of the Kennedy School's Standing Committee on Public Policy, which accepted Richwine's research and called it "sound" in an interview with The Citizen.

Last week was supposed to be a positive one for Richwine, at least from his view and that of the Heritage Foundation, which had just released a report by the analyst and Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the organization, that said the price tag of comprehensive immigration reform would be roughly $6.3 trillion. 

The think tank released the report as hearings were beginning in the Senate on a bipartisan bill and some 300 amendments regarding an overhaul of the country’s immigration system.

One of the most objectionable parts of the bill for conservatives calls for allowing millions of undocumented immigrants to be able to obtain legal status, first on a provisional basis, and eventually permanently.

"The Harvard paper is not a work product of the Heritage Foundation," according to a statement on the foundation’s blog. “Its findings do not reflect the positions of the Heritage Foundation or the conclusions of our study on the cost of amnesty to U.S. taxpayers, as race and ethnicity are not part of Heritage immigration policy recommendations.”

FOXNEWS.COM
Read more: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2013/05/20/harvard-students-demand-investigation-into-thesis-about-latino-immigrants-iq/#ixzz2Tw6OwLjj

 

Meet Julito:The Leader Behind Latino Rebels

PHOTO: Julio Ricardo Varela, the founder of Latino Rebels blog, has now also started his own radio show and foundation for young journalists and filmmakers.

It all started about two years ago with a textbook racist joke.

"Why would you want a Mexican car? 'Cuz cars reflect national characteristics, don't they?" joked Richard Hammond, one of the hosts of BBC's Top Gear. "Mexican cars are just going to be lazy, feckless, flatulent, overweight ogre, leaning against a fence asleep looking at a cactus with a blanket with a hole in the middle on as a coat."

Julio Ricardo Varela, a then 41-year-old Puerto Rican blogger who had recently left his publishing job at Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, came across the video online and like many who watched it, wasn't amused. When BBC took it down from YouTube, Varela found a copy and uploaded it to his own player on his personal blog JulioRVarela.com.

Thousands who wanted to find the video came to Varela's site, where he accused BBC of trying to cover up the whole controversy, labeling the video "lame and racist." His blog was inundated with traffic.

And so the idea for Latino Rebels, one of the most talked about Latino-centric sites, was born.

One night soon after the Top Gear video incident, Varela saw an episode of The Daily Show which left him determined to create a site to fill in as the "Latino Daily Show." The next day, Varela, who once frequented Boston's improv comedy circuit, purchased the domain name LatinoRebels.com and out of pure coincidence, on Cinco de Mayo of 2011, the site went live.

At the time, Varela wrote that one of his primary objectives was to "expose those so-called patriots who are quick to use ignorance and hate to spread lies about Latinos living in the United States."

Latino Rebels took a red star with five points, a symbol sometimes associated with communism, as its icon. But Varela insists that the choice had nothing to do with a political ideology and that he picked it from a crowd-sourced design effort simply because it "felt cool and edgy."

On the political spectrum, Varela thinks of himself as moderate.

"We don't all drink the Obama KoolAid. I'm kind of middle-of-the-roader, which is funny, because everyone thinks I'm a leftist," he said. "I've learned to kind of ignore that."

His friend and fellow "Rebelde" Charlie Garcia pokes fun at Varela for being "the intellectual offspring of a liberal northeastern Harvard education and all baggage that brings with it."

"I'm resolved to make him feel uncomfortable in his little intellectual cocoon, indeed to break him out of it," said Garcia, a marketer and businessman who says he brings to the Rebels a political ideology "formed at the U.S. Air Force Academy in the mid-West" and "in the jungles of Central America teaching counter guerilla warfare to militaries trying to shake off communist insurgencies in the 1980s."

Garcia recently joined the Rebels, a group of about 30 bloggers that includes many of Varela's close friends. Despite their political differences in other respects, the Rebels say they are intent on "kill[ing] stereotypes with humor, insight, [and] compassion" and empowering the Latino community. Other Rebels include Efrain Nieves, Tony Vargas, Bella Vida Letty, Charlie Vázquez, Tony Diaz, Odilia Rivera Santos and Rodrigo Sanchez-Chavarria.

Varela said he was determined from the beginning to make the site not just about himself, so he publishes the posts of most bloggers under the name "REBELDES," although sometimes he himself contributes with the name "JULITO." (His father is also named Julio, making him Julito to friends and family.)

Latino Rebels' primary focus is not "hard journalism," according to Varela. Instead, the blog brings attention and commentary to controversies that affect the Latino community, calling "No Mames" (Mexican slang which loosely translates from Spanish to "Stop messing around") when politicians or corporations step out of line.

"We're kind of the 'Hey, look we found this' kind of place," said Varela, who is now 43.

Varela is also intent on engaging his online community through constant back-and-forths on Facebook, Twitter, and in comment sections. His persistence has resulted in the most active commenting community in the Latino media space. Nearly three-fourths of his traffic came from Facebook last year.

However, Latino Rebels is still fairly small, and its WordPress design still somewhat rustic. Since its inception two years ago, the site has gotten nearly a million unique visitors and has built a very engaged online community largely comprised of bilingual, bicultural young Latinos, according to Varela. For comparison, The Huffington Post, one of the most trafficked news sites on the web, boasts 250 million uniques a month, but much of their traffic stems from Google searches over community engagement.

Still, Latino Rebels in many ways shapes conversations about Latinos in bigger outlets by being the first, the fastest, and the most opinionated. Where many "legacy" news sources refrain from offering harsh critiques of the media and corporate America, Latino Rebels dives in head first, often with the loudest and harshest indictments.

Some of their first big stories include a post calling out the Coors "Emboricuate" campaign as being degrading to Puerto Ricans, a video of Puerto Ricans burning an American flag during President Obama's visit to the island, and a Facebook meme featuring a farmer named Jesus.

It's hard to exist in the Latino media space without taking notice of Varela and his site on a daily basis. He's a disruptor, and an agitator, and it's clear he loves what he does. I've long wondered, how many Rebels are there really? Why no by-lines? Does every Rebelde agree with every post? (The answer to the last question is no, not always.)

Varela and I have been engaging on Twitter and Facebook since earlier this year, but after I watched his site play an integral role inbringing down La Comay, a homophobic puppet on Puerto Rican TV, I knew I wanted to know more about the head rebelde in charge.

Julio, The Fighter

Moving from San Juan to the Bronx at the age of 7, Varela said he had to learn early to defend himself. When he moved to the Bronx to live with his mother due to his parents' divorce, he was picked on for being named Julio and called a "spic" at age 10 by one of his classmates at school.

"I fought, I had to defend myself, it was nasty," he said of his middle school brawls. Later in life, Varela had to defend himself against the charge of not being "Latino enough," because his mother is Italian American. He says it's taken him into adulthood to fully resolve his complex ethnic identity.

"I've heard it all, I've heard it all, it's like 'Oh you're American, you're from the Bronx, you grew up there, your dad is from Puerto Rico," he said. "It's just like 'I was born in Puerto Rico, mancha de platano, get over it, I'm a hundred percent boricua, get over it," he said, invoking the island's slang to his imaginary aggressor.

Even when Varela got to Harvard, where he graduated cum laude with a degree in History and Literature of Latin America, he didn't stop fighting. Varela took out loans and worked for six years in his publishing job to pay off his Harvard education, in addition to a year scrubbing dorm toilets. It wasn't until his grandmother left him money in her will that he was able to pay off his debts. He's incredibly proud to have worked his way through Harvard, listing his alma mater as his first descriptor on his Twitter bio.

"On graduation day, they just handed me an envelope with a piece of cardboard in it," he said. When he returned seven years later with the last payment for his education, they finally awarded him a diploma. "They blew the dust off of it and handed it to me. It was a great feeling."

Varela is also the descendant of fighters, he says, including Congressman Mario Biaggi, a New York City cop and U.S. Congressman who was an outspoken representative for the Bronx from 1969 to 1988, but ultimately ended up serving 2.5 years in prison over corruption charges.

Varela's passion -- which he claims as his greatest strength and greatest weakness -- has been channeled more productively through Latino Rebels, he says.

"Opinions in certain situations can either harm you or help you. I'm somebody who says the emperor has no clothes a lot -- and sometimes people don't want to hear that," said Varela, who became a paid contributor at NBC Latino last year, after Latino Rebels took off in its first year.

"Love Us, Hate Us, You Can't Ignore Us"

As with many opinion-makers, not everyone agrees with Julio. Latino Rebels has some outspoken critics, probably the most vocal of which is Think Mexican, a Tumblr blog which aggregates news and culture relevant to Mexicans in the U.S. The blog has repeatedly accused Varela of trying to capitalize on the plight of Mexicans and or of working for big brands, including Fox News Latino.

"For those not aware, @latinorebels is the work of a Puerto Rican marketer using the image of Emiliano Zapata to appeal to Mexicans. Scam!," the site tweeted back in November of 2011.

Varela defended his site from their attacks in this post, and ended up blocking the Think Mexican account, and sending its leader a letter from his lawyer.

"How do we make money? From our clients," he wrote. "We make no money from our followers, nor do we ask them for money. Clients hire us to run their social media accounts and to get to the key under 25 demographic of Latinos in the US and Latin America."

Although Varela is guarded about which brands he currently represents (he says he can't name some of them under contract), he claims that at least one is a Fortune 500 Company and none of them are Fox News Latino. Varela formerly consulted Univision on Spanish-language social media strategy.

His consulting work allows him to help his wife pay the bills for their middle-school aged children who they live with in Milton, a suburb of Boston. His work also allows him to offer about $50 in compensation to some of his bloggers for four posts. The Latino Rebels site doesn't sell ads yet, and so doesn't make money from their content.

But, Varela says that what some like "Think Mexican" don't understand is that for as diverse as Latinos are "we have more similarities than we do differences." It's important we stick together, he says.

And for as much as his critics dislike him, his supporters adore him.

Latino Rebels has over 13,000 Twitter followers and 33,000 Facebook subscribers.

Charles Garcia, the Latino Rebels contributor and co-founder of the "Latino Rebels Foundation" as well as "Latino Rebels Radio" with Varela, says that "Julito" is "fearless," an hard worker who often pulls "all-nighters," a "deep-thinker," and a "giver" who "has never been driven by money."

The new Latino Rebels Foundation aims to fight discrimination against Latinos in the media and politics and provide scholarships to young Latino journalists and filmmakers. Its board members include journalists like Rick Sanchez, Pilar Marrero, Adrian Carrasquillo, and Fernando Espuelas, among others.

"You have to understand that Latino Rebels is not a money making venture – it's a money and a time suck, a bottomless pit," said Garcia. "So Julio spends a lot of time doing secondary ventures in order to keep food on the table, while Latino Rebels is this other part of his life, like an all-consuming hobby he's deeply passionate about."

But even some who say Varela's heart is in the right place, don't always agree with his outspoken opinions. Laura Martinez, a blogger who covers Latino media will also sit on the board of the the new foundation, says sometimes Varela is just too sensitive.

"[Latino Rebels is] giving Latinos a voice they haven't had before, but I don't agree with them all the time," she said. "And that's okay."

Martinez thinks Varela was misguided when he went on Colombian radio to argue that Sofia Vergara was damaging the image of Latinas in the U.S. Similarly, Martinez disagreed with Julio when he went after The Daily Show (the initial inspiration for his Rebels site) for a skit on Cinco de Mayo. Julito called it "condescending" and said "it didn't work." Martinez thought it did.

"The bit was not only funny, but why can't we be doing that?" Martinez asked. "Why can't Latino media be making fun of this kind of stuff, parodying American's ideas of Cinco de Mayo and all that. I thought it was brilliant."

But Varela welcomes the criticism. "Love us or hate us, you can't ignore us," he said of his critics. Not everything has to be a hit, he says.

"We take risks, 9 times out of 10, or 99 out of 100, its the right risk," he said. "We'll miss one or two, but you know what, so does the AP."

One of those risks might even be a change in direction, redirecting the focus of the site away from just Latinos and to a broader general market.

"I think the problem right now is that I'm also interested in stories that are not 'Latino,' but the problem is by creating a niche for Latinos, you get noticed," Varela said.

"I'd rather stop talking about immigration and media perception of Latinos, because it means if we can stop talking about it, that means we've done our job. Eventually, in five years, if I change the name of LatinoRebels.com to Rebels.com that means we've succeeded.""

But some think the Latino community needs him too much.

"I think it's a bad idea for him to move to the mainstream," said Laura Martinez. "We don't have a Latino Al Sharpton, we need a Latino Al Sharpton. He's the closest thing we have to it."

It's doubtful that Varela would ever stop defending "Latino" causes in this lifetime. He says his new Latino Rebels Foundation will be his next step to inspire future generations of Latino leaders.

"I'm done just complaining. I want to do something about this," he said.

ABCNEWS.GO.COM

http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/News/meet-julio-ricardo-varela-blogger-latino-rebels/story?id=19216198#.UZt-eYLQ0p4

 

 

U.S. economy stands to gain from immigration reform, report finds

residency waiver, immigrants and immigration reform

A new report finds that passing an immigration reform bill that would allow undocumented immigrants living in the United States to apply for a legal status would result in large benefits for the U.S. economy—with states reaping the biggest economic gains.

The report released Friday by the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning Washington think tank, comes on the heels of the Heritage Foundation study released May 6. The Heritage study suggested the Senate-proposed immigration reform bill would cost $6.3 trillion, but it received much criticism for failing to acknowledge the economic benefits that would result from the bill.

U.S. economy would benefit from immigration reform

In contrast to the Heritage study, the Center for American Progress report shows that the U.S. would see an economic boost if Congress approves an immigration reform bill that would legalize some of the 11 million undocumented immigrants currently living here.

Specifically, it would add $832 billion to the U.S. economy over a decade. It would also result in Americans seeing a cumulative increase of $470 billion in their personal incomes over 10 years. Furthermore, 121,100 new jobs would be created each year over a 10-year period.

The report also calculated the economic gains for 24 states where 88 percent of undocumented immigrants live. It found that the states’ economies stand to gain the most from the legalization of undocumented immigrants.

One of the states that would gain the most is Texas, where 1.6 million undocumented immigrants reside. If undocumented immigrants were able to gain a legal status, Texas would add $144.6 billion to its economy over a decade, according to the report.

“We see that at the national level as well as at the state level, there is a positive economic benefit—a significant one,” Angela Kelley, vice president for immigration policy and advocacy at the Center for American Progress, said during a call with reporters Friday.

“At a time when our economy is still struggling to make a comeback, it just makes sense to have immigration reform be in the mix as a way of making [the country] strong economically,” she added.

The authors of the Center for American Progress report are Robert Lynch, a professor of economics at Washington College, and Patrick Oakford, a research assistant at the Center for American Progress.

Undocumented immigrants would also make economic gains

Undocumented immigrants themselves would also see significant economic gains following the passage of an immigration reform bill that would allow them to gain a legal status.

Kelley said if undocumented immigrants are given the opportunity to gain a legal status, their chances of landing better paying jobs would increases. She also said they would have access to better training, become better educated and be able to compete for jobs they couldn’t compete for prior to gaining a legal status.

The Center for American Progress report lists five reasons why legalization would lead to an increase in earnings and economic benefits for undocumented immigrants. The report states that receiving legal status and citizenship encourages to invest in their education, makes it easier for them to change jobs when they desire, helps protect them against wage theft, provides them access to better jobs and facilitates entrepreneurship.

The authors of the report conclude stating that overall, undocumented immigrants “are contributing significantly less to the U.S. economy than they potentially could.”

“With legalization and citizenship, undocumented immigrants will produce and earn more, pay more in taxes, boost the American economy, increase the incomes of all Americans, and promote job growth,” the report’s authors write.

VOXXI.COM
Read more: http://www.voxxi.com/u-s-economy-gain-immigration-reform/#ixzz2TpgDsTxh

 

 

More Articles...
FacebookTwitterFeed

TheOpinionPoll.com

Are you for or against a law which would make it illegal to manufacture, sell, or posses semi-automatic guns known as assault rifles?